On February 14, 2024, Novethic published an article titled “Carbon Neutrality in Banking: Varied Commitments Creating Confusion,” highlighting the diversity of financial institutions’ climate commitments and the resulting complexity. Banks are making numerous announcements about their climate strategies, validated by a patchwork of methodological frameworks. However, from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) to Science-Based Targets (SBTi), these frameworks remain challenging to compare. This diversity makes it difficult to assess and compare banks’ actual actions in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The NZBA, launched in April 2021, brings together banks committed to aligning their lending and investment portfolios with net-zero pathways by 2050. However, the methodologies used vary, particularly regarding the inclusion of financed emissions, complicating performance comparisons between institutions. Additionally, some banks adopt targets validated by the SBTi, while others rely on internal or sectoral frameworks, adding to the confusion.
This situation raises questions about the transparency and credibility of banks’ climate commitments. Investors and regulators struggle to assess the real impact of actions taken, which can undermine confidence in the financial sector. To address this, initiatives to harmonize methodologies and enhance transparency are necessary. Standardizing evaluation frameworks would improve comparability and enable a more accurate assessment of banks’ progress toward carbon neutrality.
For sustainability-minded investors, closely examining banks’ climate commitments and understanding the underlying methodologies is essential. Favoring financial institutions that adopt recognized and transparent frameworks, such as the SBTi, can provide greater confidence in the credibility of their emission reduction actions. Furthermore, encouraging banks to harmonize methodologies and improve transparency will support more accurate assessments of climate-related risks and opportunities, promoting more informed investment decisions.
Source:
